Gayle asked:
> Bareners, it's exciting to see all the new postings as it makes the
> forum
> interesting. May I suggest that you not put long quotes within your
> messages.
Related to the very large volume of messages we are processing
recently, let me enlarge a bit on Gayle's point about quoting ... If
you understand how our system works, you can send more effective
messages.
Messages for the group are all processed by the Majordomo server here
in Japan at Asahi-net. We don't have any control over that processing,
and basically what comes out, is what you send. People who read [Baren]
a single message at a time, are reading what Majordomo sends.
Unfortunately, because - even with endless horsewhipping from
moderators over the years - people frequently include large amounts of
extraneous material in their posts, the Digests produced by Majordomo
are totally unreadable. If you are receiving the version labelled as:
Baren Digest (old)
... you know what I mean. It's not just from quote clippings - or the
inclusion of masses of HTML formatting - it's that people frequently
quote the _entire_ previous Digest. These old Digests are chaos.
To get around this, we have created our own _post-processing_ script
that runs on the barenforum.org website. This takes in copies of the
Majordomo individual messages, attempts to clean out as much of the
unwanted material as possible, and then packages them up into the
digest versions labelled as:
New Baren Digest : Text
New Baren Digest : HTML
Note: if you are still trying to read the old version, then get thee to
this page and change your subscription:
http://www.barenforum.org/subscribing/switch.php
It works pretty well. But our script runs without human intervention -
of course - and has to make its own decisions on what to cut, and what
to leave. Most of the time it gets it pretty close, but sometimes it
misses the mark, and mangles the message.
Here's how you can help ensure your message gets through properly.
Send plain text rather than HTML. I know that many of you don't know
how to do that, so Mr. Digester is trained to convert it all to plain.
But errors will occur; to minimize them, send plain text.
- if you are a 'top-quoter' - with the quoted material appearing
_before_ your comments - then make sure that you start the quote on the
_very first line of your email_. Then trim trim trim, leaving only a
line or two that will let your readers know what you are referring to.
If you leave too much, you are in danger of having Mr. Digester take
out his knife, and he will slash blindly, no doubt removing much of
your own content.
- if you are a 'bottom-quoter', it's easier for Mr. Digester to know
where to operate. He simply kills the entire quote. This has saved us
_so much grief_, and cuts down the volume of message content by a huge
amount.
- if you are a 'mix and match' quoter - quoting and commenting, quoting
and commenting - you will need to know how to sneak past Mr. Digester's
knives. Here's how to do it:
1) Start your first quote on the _very first line of the post_. Keep it
very short. You can start with original content if you wish, no problem
there either.
2) Don't use HTML formatting to distinguish what is quote and what is
original. Mr. Digester removes _all_ such formatting, and your readers
won't know what is going on ...
3) For _embedded_ quote snippets, don't use the phrase "xxxx wrote:",
as this is one of the triggers that tells Mr. Digester where to wield his blade.
Change it to "xxx added:" or some other such phrase ...
If you follow these basic precepts, your message should go through cleanly.
Another quirk: avoid using the 'greater than' or 'less than' symbols in your
cute emoticons or your signature. Mr. Digester is trained to hunt down and kill
HTML formatting, and this will incorrectly trigger him to start chopping stuff away.
I'm sorry for seeming to be laying down 'rules' here, but this is all in a good
cause - our 'new' version Digests are very readable, and if you follow these
rules exactly, they will require a minimum of work from the archivist to prepare
for the website. And of course, your message will be understood.
Thanks for understanding ...
Dave