Marissa wrote:
>Mike, thank you for the feedback. Your work shows that you have a
>lot more patience than I do.
Naw... I'm actually very IMpatient and always hurrying, hurrying,
hurrying -- I have the almost constant feeling that my life is too
short and I have SO much I'd like to do and so little time
left... Probably a stage of life thing. As a painting student at
KCAI in the mid-70s I felt I was 'learning' patience, as the whole
process seemed SO tedious... I spent a couple of years painting
there under Wilbur Niewald who taught 'visual' (plein air) painting
with a direct and opaque oil technique (no glazes or the like, just
laying on opaque color richer over leaner) and trying to make the
canvas as much like the vision as possible (we were painting only
from life -- nude, still life, landscape). I think that in those
years I first began to acquire a sort of 'honesty' in that I began to
try hard to avoid preciously holding onto those parts I thought were
'good' and instead to try to respond to those changes I 'felt'
without respect to what I'd painted before. That started me
concentrating on perception and in retrospect seems to have naturally
led to my more recent work.
David Bull (the founder of Baren) once said something like, "If you
enjoy doing something, isn't it better if it takes longer?" I try to
remind myself of that whenever I am tempted to cut corners. Anyway,
I have been trying very hard to make the best stuff I am able --
because of my feeling that time is so short, I've been trying to make
good choices about 'what' to do, but at the same time trying not to
sacrifice 'quality' in the interest of time... So in woodcut, if 30
blocks seems a better expression than 15, I cut 30. Something like
that... I'm experimental in approach, but I do edition in the
academic sense (clean and identical prints in an edition) -- in the
interest of time and economy, my edition sizes do seem to be getting
smaller and smaller though. I plan only tiny editions of 3 to 5 for
my largest work next year.
>I got a Moku Hanga gift set from McClain's awhile back and I ended
>up frustrated and with brush hair in my ink.
Some 'economy' brushes seem to shed and shed until the hair is all
gone. That's VERY frustrating! Baren Mall offers two types of
maru-bake -- the 'sosaku' brushes are cheaper and they shed a LOT at
first but eventually become useful. The more expensive
'professional' brushes on BarenMall are the best I've used -- similar
to McClain's best brushes which MUST be prepared by singeing and
abrasion (sharkskin or belt sander or the like, as they arrive with
the hairs cut off square on the ends and won't print well like that),
but Baren's are slightly less expensive and arrive ready to use (for
my purposes, anyway) with nice tapered pointy hairs. They seem to
shed very little if at all and I recommend you try one of those if
you ever decide to print with water-borne pigments again. Brushes
actually are almost like a dream come true when compared to brayers
-- VERY fast and VERY easy once you become accustomed. I've printed
extensively both ways and have come to much prefer watercolor and
brushes to ink and brayers, but that's just my own experience --
there's no 'right' way, of course! Because the hairs are attached to
the brush in 'tufts' it's better to snip off any which start to stick
out with a scissors than to pull them out -- that keeps the tuft
'fat' where it's attached -- if you pull out the loose hairs, the
whole tuft becomes looser and then more and more hairs from that tuft
will tend to slide out, too.
>Plus, since I prefer to work fairly large wouldn't the ink dry
>before I got to or finished printing the image?
Drying on the block really hasn't been a problem at all for me in 20
x 30 inch prints so far. I'm about to begin printing 3x6 feet
(couple more weeks) and plan to continue to use pigment, paste, brush
as usual -- I'll let you know whether drying becomes a problem, but
obviously I don't believe it's going to be -- paste is not only a
vehicle for the pigment, it's also a very effective retardant.
>When I read that the brushes are supposed to be hit against a piece
>of sharkskin for the better part of a day I was filled with
>horror! Even inking up my large blocks with a brayer, the largest I
>have is only 3" (with a 6" coming in the mail) and my blocks are
>often 22" x 28", is already not one of my favorite tasks. How do
>the brushes compare to brayers and how do you keep the hairs from
>falling out into the ink?
Me too (sharkskin)! I've tried that and I don't enjoy it at
all! The 'pros' do seem still to regularly treat their brushes that
way (by running them for hours across stretched sharkskin) -- the
idea is to both taper the hair ends and more importantly to split the
ends which allows smoother brush-up (kinda like those hardware store
brushes with synthetic bristles which are split and resplit at the
ends -- the more hairs, the smoother the paint goes on). I've made a
ton of 'student' brushes from horsehair shoe brushes (I look for
cheap brushes with the most dense hairs -- thin/few hairs are less
suitable) and then 'prepare them' by trimming to shape with scissors,
then singing the ends (SMELLY!) with a propane torch, then sanding
them for a few minutes on a belt or disk sander. That seems to
produce a decent printing brush very quickly! My experience is that
the 'professional' brushes from BarenMall
http://barenforum.org/mall/products/maru_bake.php are good to go when
they arrive -- no split ends, but nicely tapered and print very well
right out of the box.
Having printed a LOT with watercolor and brushes as well as with ink
and rollers, I've believe that brushes are faster and easier than
brayers, although the techniques are so different that comparison is
kinda fuzzy :). Hairs don't fall out of good quality (and well
maintained) brushes and a large brush in a practiced hand prepares a
huge area VERY quickly -- much faster and easier than with a roller, IMO.
-- Mike
Mike Lyon
Kansas City, Missouri
http://mlyon.com