Baren Digest Friday, 16 February 2001 Volume 14 : Number 1320 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: GraphChem@aol.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:32:22 EST Subject: [Baren 13401] Re: Toxic Watercolors The simple fact of toxicity is - check the label! There are very few pigments that are toxic, but if the ink/paint or whatever carries an ACMI seal that means that the formula has been check for both chronic (long term) and acute (immediate) toxicity. I know of no situation where a pigment can be used for oil and not water - except for the fact that many pigments are not suitable for use in both. That is to say that they don't work in water systems, while others don't work in oil. I would respectfully suggest that there is more to the story. Graphic Chemical was one of six companies that were instrumental in structuring ACMI (the others being Winsor-Newton, Binney & Smith, Martin/F. Weber, Hunt Mfg, and Grumbacher). The manufacturers of art materials in general have been very proactive in making people aware of health hazards, working with legislators, toxicologists, ASTM and many others to insure that hazardous materials were properly labeled (and where possible eliminated). Dean Clark ------------------------------ From: GraphChem@aol.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:40:52 EST Subject: [Baren 13402] Re: Toxic Watercolors Barbara - The assumption that pigments would react the same way from ceramics to inks is incorrect, but it points out the problems encountered on the manufacturing end. For example, take the cadmiums. Glazes use cadmium oxides and inks use cadmium sulfides. Under many circumstances they react somewhat the same. The problem is that cadmium sulfides can be carcinogenic when exposed to high levels of heat - something of a problem in some glazes. Cadmium oxides on the other hand present almost no problems. The fact that some pigments have the same color name does not mean that they are the same chemical. All manufacturers of art materials are subject to ASTM standards, which include formula review by a toxicologist. I'll get off of the soap box now. Dean Clark ------------------------------ From: ArtfulCarol@aol.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:51:48 EST Subject: [Baren 13403] Re: thanks, etc Congrats to you, Sarah, and April for the Japan Society workshop coming up. Maye you can get to see their video of Minakata at work. He is hacking away, yes hacking! "It's not the way that you do it ", but the way it comes out. I admired your Dachshund when I viewed it a while ago. Way to go! Take care. Carol ------------------------------ From: Daniel Dew Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Baren 13404] FW: exchange 9 "salon de refuse`" Alrighty then folks, we now have about 10 people who want to do a mini exchange along the theme of "Endangered Species". I want to get the ball rolling, so I would like to close this on Monday. Anyone interested at all, mail me off list by the end of Sunday (EST). SIze is open, no larger than 11" x 15", lino or wood, oil or water, yada, yada. dan dew ------------------------------ From: B E Mason Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:06:33 -0800 Subject: [Baren 13405] winter and stuff Dave, That was so beautiful. We almost never get snow here in the moderate Northwest. They promise and then it just misses us and goes farther east. I did a demo last Saturday and it was snowing like crazy, but it was 40 degrees so it melted as soon as it hit the ground. I only got 5 people to show up, everyone here is so afraid to drive in snow. It worked out well, as I was able to let then all make a print. Couldn't have done that with 25 people and only 2 hours. It was a relief print, drawn with a ball point pen on Scratch foam (styrofoam) and printed with a rainbow roll with speedball watersoluble ink on dry paper. They turn out quite beautiful with the lines white. Such a simple process and so fast. I think I hooked all five of them into printmaking, so my day was a great success. I always tell everyone about the baren but do not know if they actually come on down and visit us. I have a philosophical question of sorts. What do you people do when asked to donate work? I think I give away at least 10 pieces a year and just yesterday got a call from a local private highschool for a piece for their auction. Last year I asked them to send me a catalog and when I saw how they listed the artwork, all jumbled in with everything else I decided to get a stiffer backbone this year and I actually told them no and to take my name off their list. Today I feel guilty but glad I did it. It does get our name out there, but is this cost a little high? And what about the $300 piece that can sell for less than the cost of the frame for charity? I am starting to think it would be better to write a check to them and keep my work. Comments on this? How do you handle this over time?? Just tell everyone to take a hike? Barbara ------------------------------ From: "Bea Gold" Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:46:25 -0800 Subject: [Baren 13406] Re: Copyrights and aromatic cleaners charset="iso-8859-1" I love your tattoo story Michelle. Does the guy live in San Diego? I wonder if I would recognize your work if I saw him on the beach? Bea ------------------------------ From: Wanda Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:13:38 -0700 Subject: [Baren 13407] Re: Copyrights and aromatic cleaners Michelle wrote: > >the arm or chest--it seemed rather large). Anyway, turns out he'd bought a > >wood engraving of mine a year or so earlier and had gone down to San Diego > >and had a tattoo artist engrave him with it. It was a nice job all in all, Very interesting, Michelle! I think you handled it very sensibly. I'm afraid I would have burst out laughing. We want to see pictures! I am glad to have the toxic cleaners information - but I am of the opinion (perhaps goofy) that almost everything is toxic in large enough amounts. At least there is no lead in our paints, oils & inks any more. My favorite white when I painted with oils many years ago, was Lead White. And then we can get into house paints, household cleaners (I also hate that simple green stuff & I suspect it is *not* simple) furniture refinishing stuff, car stuff: brake fluid, anti-freeze, etc. It's a big bad world out there, so don't drink the stuff! I guess I have a fatal view of life - we *are* going to die someday, we all hope it won't be too soon, but live and enjoy it while we are here! Like a friend of mine likes to say: "Life, sexually transmitted and always fatal" Today is a good day - enjoy! Wanda ------------------------------ From: Julio.Rodriguez@walgreens.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:34:12 -0600 Subject: [Baren 13408] Re: FW: exchange 9 "salon de refuse`" 02/15/2001 12:34:00 PM Dan and other refusees (?), that are not in the current list for exchange #9. Although I am in for #9, I would also like to participate in the mini-exchange you guys are planning. Put my name down. My intensions are to display all the "endangered species" prints I receive by mid May at the Skokie exhibit (May & June). Sounds like the size you have selected is different from the official #9, but I will still accomodate for display purposes. Julio ------------------------------ From: Julio.Rodriguez@walgreens.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:41:07 -0600 Subject: [Baren 13409] Re: ANDI 02/15/2001 01:40:55 PM Hi Sarah, congratulations on your upcoming events with April and all the shows. ANDI arrived safe and sound. What a cutie and such a human like expression. Looking forward to your Chicago show at WomanMade gallery. Are you there for their Cats & Dogs show that starts June 22 or are you having your very own solo exhibit ? Anyhow, would like to meet and if you get into town before the 22nd, the Skokie Exhibit should still be up. Hello to Gail, Sue and all the new people onboard...Julio ------------------------------ From: "eli griggs" Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Baren 13410] lead pigments etc charset="iso-8859-1" Hi there: Lead White is still around and doing quite nicely, thank you very much. It was banned for a while, but it is such an important pigment to artists that it was given a reprieve by 'big brother'. Lead has special qualities as an oil painting white that Titanium and Zinc do not come close to matching. It is a dream on the brush and canvas and mixes perfectly. The other whites can not match its' warmth and I doubt there is anything out there in the labs that would fit the bill so far as performance and aesthetes are concerned. A lot of the alarm over lead was, rightly so, raised by the use of lead in non-artist commercial products, house paints, paints on toys and cribs and its' use in some ceramic glazes. The spectre of thousands of poisoned children who mouthed lead painted matter and ate pealing chips of paint caused its' outright ban and, in an over-reaction, its' temporary absence from the artist pallet. An knee jerk that was finally put right. What does this have to do with woodcut printmaking? Well, I think that a lot of artist have gotten hold of the wrong end of the stick when it comes to using 'toxic materials'. Yes, Lead and other heavy metal pigments can do a great deal of harm, IF handled improperly! Handled by a knowing, well informed and responsible artist community, Lead and other heavy metal pigments are reasonably safe. Artist need to know, before they buy their materials, just what it is that they are buying, how to handle it and what is needed to clean up any residues. That means that they need to press makers of artist materials to label properly, and boycott if they refuse. Secret ingredients have ruined many a good piece of art and are a potential danger to the artist's health. Think of those artist that point up watercolour brushes with their mouths, unawares of poisons they are digesting. A few years ago I received a sample of French watercolour white that was in fact Lead. This is an example of a good pigment made into the wrong medium and knowing its' potential danger, I disposed of it. And what of printers using dry pigments for Hanga, do you know what is really in that pretty mix you are grinding? Whenever I buy a colour I want to know what pigment I am getting, with its' pigment number and chemical name clearly marked, NOT some pie-in-the-sky marketing name. If I buy Yellow Ochre, I want Yellow Ochre, not Mars Yellow, which is what a lot of people are selling under the name Yellow Ochre. And when I buy a red Cadmium pigment I want to know which Cadmium I am getting and what fillers have been added, so I can decide if I am getting what I paid for as well as how to handle it. If something contains something else like Toluol (for example) then I'm going to want to know that too! The point I'm trying to make is, as artist, our craft (in whatever medium) demands that we manipulate sometimes dangerous materials. That is the nature of art. Therefore it is incumbent on US to know what we are doing and to separate fact from PC hysteria when it comes to using turpentine, lead, and any other matter we have imperfect knowledge of. Only then can we safely use proper materials for the art we create. Eli Griggs Charlotte N.C. USA ------------------------------ From: Daniel Dew Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Baren 13411] Salon De Refuse The list is growing! Anyone in the "official" exchange can print up around 10 or 15 more and get even more back by joining our little group. Let me know off-line. So far, max size is 11" x 15", smaller is O.K., just no bigger. No cases. Due date June 1st. dan dew ------------------------------ From: Julio.Rodriguez@walgreens.com Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:44:33 -0600 Subject: [Baren 13412] Re: Salon De Refuse 02/15/2001 03:44:22 PM "..Due date June 1st..." Dan, are you coordinating the mini exchange ?, meaning...is everyone sending you the prints for collating ? I need to have them earlier by May 15th in order to exhibit them in Skokie. The official #9 exchange is due May 1st. With two weeks for the usual late arrivals....mid-May seems about right to have most of the prints in hand. Please advise as June 1st is just too late for me. Julio ps. Can you send me a list of the mini-participants ? ------------------------------ From: slinder@mediaone.net Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:01:40 -0600 Subject: [Baren 13414] Shipping cartons for art work Propack is offering a 20% discount to Baren members interested in purchasing their art shipping cartons. For sizes and prices go to the page from the bottom of their web page. Measurements are the inside dimensions of the cartons. To receive the discount, please mention [Baren] when ordering. Sharen Cucamongie@aol.com wrote: > Oh yeah, I just received word that one of my BIG (25" x 34") doggy prints (a dachshund wearing a checkered sweater on a Byzantine pattern background) was accepted into the Art Show at the Dog show (hence my recent post about sending big things, thanks to everyone for that, I ended up buying an art carton from Propack, Sharen sent me this website, I received it today and it looks quite sturdy). > best wishes all, > Sarah ------------------------------ From: Claude Villeneuve Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Baren 13415] Re: winter and stuff Barbara: Re: Giving prints for charitable causes.I have become very SELECTIVE over the years. I don't give anything for auctions unless I can set the departure price and get a percentage on the sales. There are a few places I still send prints to because I know and trust the organizers and know that they have RESPECT for the artists they sollicit. In other cases - I just say NO. The problem with artists is that we are the ones who make less money, our supplies cost a lot and people don't understand or respect what we do and want everything for free. So it's about time we start respecting ourselves by learning to say NO - even if we feel guilty for a while. On snow: Come to Montreal (or go to St.John Newfoundland) you'll get lots and lots of snow! :-) Claude Aimˇe ------------------------------ From: b.patera@att.net Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:16:07 +0000 Subject: [Baren 13417] Re: Toxic Watercolors Dean, Thanks for the information. It is good to know that the pigments used in inks are less/ or non-toxic. Though I always try for those inks and paints labeled as safe I still try to err on the side of caution. Barbara P. ------------------------------ From: barebonesart Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:26:07 -0800 Subject: [Baren 13418] Re: Baren Digest v14 #1319 Michelle, I beg to differ with you on the clean up with vegetable oil. It does cut it and very nicely. I can clean a large roller just as fast with veg. oil as I can with petroleum products, and feel a whole lot better. Breathing the vapors of mineral spirits etc., makes many of us nauseous & gives headaches, no matter how well the scene is ventilated. Its all in what you get used to - - at first it took me longer to clean up, but not any more. Make the transition, you'll be glad you did. And, you'll save money in the long run. And, now to resurrect a recent discussion which has already been discussed to death, I just read this in the latest Smithsonian in an article about William Merritt Chase. He is quoted as saying the following to his students: "Be like a sponge, ready to absorb all you can....I have been a thief: I have stolen all my life - I have never been so foolhardy as to refrain from stealing for fear I should be considered as not 'original.'" Words to take to heart. As for the safety of waterbased products - we should use all materials carefully and sensibly. Don't lick your brushes, don't eat your ink. Seriously, everything should be used with caution and wear gloves. I think people are missing the point here. The point is not that the inks are any safer than their oil based counterparts. The point is that the clean-up is so much easier and nothing more than soap and water are needed. Its the clean up that's the issue :>) Did that sound like a lecture? Sorry, I slip back into teacher mode very easily - Sharri ------------------------------ From: "Garth Hammond" Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:56:20 -0700 Subject: [Baren 13419] Re: winter and stuff charset="iso-8859-1" RE:What do you people do when asked to donate work? How odd that you should ask.....This is something that has been bugging me for a long time. I am "giving" a print framed this year to the channel 6 auction. Good cause and I feel Ok about it and yet somehow it feels not like a fair exchange. Expectations again?, that demon of the human species? I feel used and don't know why. It is odd we get a table for the show and they chat us up etc. I guess it is like the chatty cathy or carl who drop by the studio and eat up time and energy. I am not sure I said anything and it may be off topic but this issue makes jangles in my spine. by the way thanks to Dean for the information. Garth ------------------------------ From: "Charles and Gail Sheffield" Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:46:08 -0800 Subject: [Baren 13420] Donations charset="iso-8859-1" Re: Donations. Claude V., in his earlier post, had it correctly. BE SELECTIVE. Give only when it is your absolute most personally cherished cause and/or when you think the exposure is worth it. It is not selfish to refuse others, so DON'T FEEL GUILTY, even if it is a good cause. It is true that artists' efforts are not appreciated by the public, so they freely ask. One must bite one's tongue not to counter with "Sure, I'll donate this piece of art if you will donate your paycheck!" Unfortunately, they would not understand. For those who ask for money or art, I just say that my giving has already been budgeted and I can't give to everybody even though I would like to. Gail Sheffield Covington, LA ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest v14 #1320 *****************************