[Baren]: The mailing list / discussion forum for woodblock printmaking. Baren Digest Tuesday, 28 July 1998 Volume 04 : Number 227 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Gayle Wohlken Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 09:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Baren 1256] Re: Baren Digest V4 #226 Baren, Welcome to Ray and I can't wait to see an entry by you in the Encyclopedia. *** Dave, You said regarding http://www.woodblock.com/forum/archives/vol04/extras/goyo_face.jpg > Notice also that nearly all the delicate hair carving on the key block > is obscured by the darker printings that come later ... When I print with oil based ink, the keyblock comes last. I think I'm getting confused about the order. With hanga then the keyblock is printed first, then the colors? Is the keyblock generally printed in a soft color? A gray or tan? I notice the ones with figures in them seem to be printed in a soft hue. By the way, thank you for that demonstration. I like being able to see the prints very closely like you have shown this one. Gayle Wohlken ------------------------------ From: Graham Scholes Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 07:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Baren 1257] Re: Reply to welcomes/Aleutian Islands >One challenge I've had as a printmaker now is to figure out what to do >with trees--the Aleutians were blessedly free of them and you could see >the shapes of the mountains. Two thingies here Ray. Now, with all the wonderful forms or trees, (and you have many more in the east) the fun part of the fun starts. The mountains shapes just look fatter and green. The challange will be the greens. Tougher stuff to handle. Have fun Graham ------------------------------ From: Matthew.W.Brown@VALLEY.NET (Matthew W Brown) Date: 27 Jul 98 11:09:23 EDT Subject: [Baren 1258] Paper wetting Jean wrote: >I notice that when I put my dampened paper between blotters, the water >seems to sit on top in beads. It is hard to get it just right for printing. >I am using my favorite Rives for this and smooth blotters. I have never >tried to use the rough blotters. Could this be the problem? I don't think this is a sizing issue. Did you re-stack your sheets? I use Rives Lightwt and Heavywt a lot and find this paper dampens very well, the method of which I will describe in a one-pointer which probably won't get sent to Dave for another two weeks. Toshi Yoshida's book describes a method, as does the H. Yoshida book Dave recently posted on the Pedia, without the use of blotters, but by a pattern of re-stacking the sheets which allows the moisture to move through the sheets. Matt Brown ------------------------------ From: StudioJNC@aol.com Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 11:48:25 EDT Subject: [Baren 1259] Blotters and Paper Thanks to Dave, James and Matt, in responding to my problem re; the water staying on top of my Rives in beads. Boy, have I been doing a bad job of blotting my paper, both light weight and heavy Rives. I have been soaking the Rives for 30 minutes. Then put it between two sheets of smooth blotters and then hand wipe the blotters, back and forth, not using a rolling pin. When I run my print on the damp paper I put it between two sheets of newsprint and then two sheets of blotters, a real sandwich. Well, I just acquired a rolling pin and will use that instead of a hit and miss action of hand wiping. I also weight the prints down with diving weights, perhaps too Heavy!!!!!I I have a lot to learn and thanks for the help. Welcome to the new members !! A Convention????? Jeanne ------------------------------ From: "Roger A. Ball" Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 10:54:01 -0600 Subject: [Baren 1260] watercolor Hello all. Welcome to the new members! I have at last succeeded (sort of) at printing with watercolor. It isn't much and I still have a bunch to learn, but here's a peek: http://www.inquo.net/~beckorro/woodcut/xcard1b.jpg Stats: Pine, watercolor/ricepaste brushed on, single impression, Rives BFK buff moistened overnight, barened. Thanks to all for your help and recommendations. Roger ------------------------------ From: Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 11:35:54 -0700 Subject: [Baren 1261] Re: Possible work? to the printers, I have recieved a call this morning regarding a publisher who is looking for artwork of a Chinook Salmon to use a a book cover. I don't happen to have ever done a print of one myself but perhaps one of you has? If so let me know and I'll help you connect. Andrea ------------------------------ From: Hideshi Yoshida Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 08:01:47 +0900 Subject: [Baren 1262] Re: cleaning brayers Dear James, I've been busy, so I couldn't send a mail. Sorry. You wrote >You wrote in your answer to Graham that you print the Liquitex block >first, and then ink on top of that. By "ink" do you mean oil-based >pigment? If so, I would think you are wise to print in the order that >you do, because-- when reversed-- the oil-based ink would repel the >water-based Liquitex. > >[Liquitex is a great product, by the way. They make the best gesso I've >ever come across.] Yes, I mean " ink " is oil-based ink. I'm using lithoink produced by Japanese art material shop "Bumpodo". Hideshi Yoshida ------------------------------ From: steiner Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 09:42:01 +0900 Subject: [Baren 1263] Welcome to Ray Hudson Ray; In your first letter, you mentioned Dale DeArmond, the Alaskan printmaker. Many years ago I bought a book of hers plus a set of other books with prints done by native Canadian and Alaskan artists on their myth themes. I tried to contact DeArmond's publisher because I and several of my students wanted to order more of her books. No reply. May I ask you to give me her address, or an address where I can contact her? Dale's prints are excellent; I want her to send work to the Kyoto International Woodprint Asso. (KIWA) exhibition next year. Your mention of the printing technique you learned in China from Lu Fang brought a smile to my lips. I want to comment on that for the BAREN members. 30 years ago, when I first began to study woodblock printmaking in Hiroshima, that was the main way westudents printed. We used Japanese washi which is heavier than what the paper you used seemed to be. Printing that way is slow, of course, but terrible accurate. To this day, I occasionally use that technique when I have a print that demands such careful attention. There are several ways to register paper on the blocks. However, the tried and true Edo Period kento keying technique is the best, I believe, even tho I teach some of the other methods. Kurosaki has evolved his own way to register the paper onto the blocks: using a sheet of film that has the image drawn on it, he has it attached to a stand that sets near the "top" side of the block; that is, opposite you, the printer, not just in front of yourself, as is the usual case. The film is rolled up and so rests out of the way when printing the block. Kurosaki will bring a block to the table (he prints standing up, as does Clifton Karhu) and lays it down, unrolls the film over the block and peering thru the film, adjusts the block until it lines up with that part of the image he is going to print. That done, the film springs back out of the way, and he inks the block and prints it. Toshi Yoshida used the Ukiyo-e method. My first teacher, Tokumitsu, used the same technique (mentioned above) as Lu Fang, and he also used another: instead of carving the kento near the corners of the block, he would use the actual corner of the blocks to line up the paper for printing. Very economical! And last year, there was a demonstration of carving and printing in the Chinese way by two Chinese artesians. They were specialists in Nenga, the New Years Good Luck prints. The paper to be printed, rather thin, was tightly bound on one side between two wooden slats. This laid on one table, the pile folded back upon itself. This table was separated a few centimeters from another table upon which rested the block. That was inked, the top sheet of paper was lifted up and laid on the block, printed, then picked up and dropped down between the two tables, out of the way of the next sheet. The first color finished, the next block was put in place, the papers lifted back up and laid down as they had originally been, and the process repeated. Accuracy was abysmal, but the prints had spunk. I could go on about moistening paper but will stop for now. from Richard Steiner, Kyoto ------------------------------ From: Elizabeth Atwood Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 20:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Baren 1264] New Member Welcome to Ray Hudson. Believe me....you will learn to do grand things with the trees! I'm happpy to hear that there are so many of us here in New England. My daughter is living in the state of Washington...sometimes wishing she were living in Vancouver.....because she fell in love with the study of Northwest Coast Indians.....up by Prince Rupert, etc. And my nephews are in Alaska....a beautiful part of the world......for young people. In Northwest art,I have a handsome serigraph entitled "Sea Ghost" by Robert Davidson. Have you collected any of his work? Also, work by Dale DeArmand....another favorite of mine. Thanks for the input on technique, etc......... Bettie ------------------------------ From: Graham Scholes Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 23:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Baren 1265] Re: Welcome to Ray Hudson Richard Steiner, Kyoto wrote. > I want to comment on that for the BAREN >members. 30 years ago, when I first began to study woodblock printmaking >in Hiroshima, that was the main way westudents printed. We used Japanese >washi which is heavier than what the paper you used seemed to be. Printing >that way is slow, of course, but terrible accurate. .................etc >etc etc ............... >I could go on about moistening paper but will stop for now. Richard, Someday it may be possible to have a little video clip showing the verbal explanation. I could not follow and visualize the methods and techniques you were describing. Is it possible you can get some digitized images to illustrate things. Graham ------------------------------ From: Jean Eger Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:26:58 -0700 Subject: [Baren 1266] Re: Baren Digest V4 #226 Welcome Ray, I was glad to read your description of your time in Hangzhou and wish you'd write more about that. I read about a college exchange program with a university there, through U. Minnesota, but I couldn't pull it off. Perhaps some other time. Interesting that they used watercolor--was it tube watercolor or pigment? Is this the ancient process or one commonly used today? In San Jose, CA, I saw a print by a Vietnamese artist which was a clay print. It was quite beautiful but they didn't say exactly how it was done. Graham-- I bought an HP Photo Smart digital camera at a computer show here for $144 plus tax. It is fun to use but the quality of the photos is VERY disappointing. It's very low-res, poor quality compared to a scan of a regular photo. I'd stick to the SLR until the technology is better, if I were you. On the other hand, any time I want, I can go out and take photos without having to buy film or pay to get it developed. Sorry Dave, that's a bit off the subject of woodcuts. Re: rollers. Lacquer thinner will melt a roller. Don't ask me how I know that. Jean Eger ------------------------------ From: David Bull Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 20:51:15 +0900 Subject: [Baren 1267] Re: which came first ... Gayle wrote: >When I print with oil based ink, the keyblock comes last. I think >I'm getting confused about the order. With hanga then the keyblock >is printed first, then the colors? In this Japanese tradition, if I said that the keyblock was printed first in about 99.99% of cases, I think I might be underestimating it. The keyblock is the root and foundation of these prints. It is carved first, and acts as the origin for the colour blocks, and it is then printed first, and acts as the framework for the colours. As to the colour of the keyblock, in the Ukiyo-e tradition it is most frequently printed in a muted grey, although a number of Hokusai's landscapes use Prussian Blue. And in answer to the next obvious question - If the key block is printed first, don't the colours cover up the outlines? - the answer is that with one exception (the white pigment known as 'gofun') the pigments used are transparent. The keyblock lines show clearly through the overlaid colours. It is the opaqueness of gofun that leads to it only being used for applying highlights on top of other colours, and for such things as snow that is sometimes 'sprayed' on top of prints. It is never used to mix other colours into more delicate tints, as it turns them into a chalky white and semi-opaque colour which is unacceptable in this tradition. Red is red. To make pink, one simply adds water ... never white. *** While I'm talking about Gayle ... I should mention that her contribution to the 'Who is Baren' page went up this afternoon, including a few prints you haven't seen before. While I was at it, I also did the page for recent new member Elizabeth Atwood, containing three of her prints (Bettie, after people have had a chance to see these, I hope you will consider making a post giving us some information on how they were made ...). So 11 of the 45 [Baren] members are now represented on that page, and a couple more are in preparation ... I'd like it to be 45 out of 45! http://www.woodblock.com/forum/ *** I'd also like to ask about some of your addresses ... I sent my newest newsletter out to the printer this afternoon, and it will be ready to mail shortly. Anybody who isn't yet on my personal mailing list and who would like to receive these things, please let me know your address (off list ...). (If you got the previous one OK, then you're already on the list ...) Dave ------------------------------ End of Baren Digest V4 #227 ***************************